Learn more about ADD


oddkidout.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

children college
child  

A Dialogue with an ADHD Non-Believer

Dear  Sir,"First, ADD is not a precisely circumscribed
set of symptoms. The ever-present "often" in
It was with some interest that I read thethe diagnostic criteria betrays the loose
article What You Should Know About Attentionboundaries of ADD, and it explains why
Deficit Disorder by Edward W. after having itAmericans use the diagnosis so frequently.
handed to me by a member of our church. ThereAlmost anyone can squeeze into the parameters
were elements of the article that were-  at  least  on  certain  days."  -  p  59
insightful, helpful, and needed to be said in
a public forum, especially the discussion ofThis statement is also potentially misleading
the moral and spiritual dimensions ofto the readers. "The ever-present 'often' in
behavior. For this part of the article Ithe diagnostic criteria..." is very similar
applaud  Mr.  W.to the "ever present" "nearly every day" in
the diagnostic criteria for Depression. The
However, Mr. W's discussion on the"often" is simply a realistic description of
physiological/biological aspects of ADD ADHDlife for individuals with ADD. It is not
was lacking to the point of being misleading"always" as with a structural head injury. It
to the readers. I am sure that Mr. Welch hadis "often" because it is the result of
no intention of misleading any readers, asneurological mechanisms being "often"
that would hardly reflect the "biblicalunder-aroused  and  "often" under-performing.
guidelines with which to understand ADD" that
he seeks to communicate. Therefore, for the". . . and it explains why Americans use the
sake of clarifying some details, may Idiagnosis  so  frequently."
present the following evidence. Perhaps in
the near future you would run an article thatStudies show that 3% to 5% of the population
would present some of this information tohas ADHD. Over-diagnosis, if there is any, is
your readers, so that they have an accuratenot due to the diagnostic criteria, but
understanding  of  the  disorder.rather to a lack of a comprehensive
diagnostic  work-ups  by  most  physicians.
"Other books use a biological approach,
claiming that brain functioning explains"Almost anyone can squeeze into the
every  behavior."  -  p  58parameters  -  at  least  on  certain  days."
I might say that I have read several books onThis is misleading to the readers, and simply
the biological realities of ADD ADHD, andnot true. Remember, the DSM-IV also includes
brain functioning in general, and none ofthese important, and highly discriminating,
them have claimed "that brain functioningcriteria:
explains every behavior." They do, however,
point out the differences in both structure- Six or more symptoms of Inattention, having
and function of a brain with ADD ADHD, orlasted at least six months, to a degree that
other disorders, vs. brains without theseis  maladaptive;
disorders. It is misleading to suggest that
"books (using) a biological approach" make- Six or more symptoms of
such a claim. Perhaps one or two do, but I amImpulsivity-Hyperactivity, having lasted at
not  familiar  with  any  at  all.least six months, to a degree that is
maladaptive;
"In other words, their attention is
inconsistent rather than universally poor." -- Symptoms of the disorder were present
p  59before the age of seven;Impairment is present
in  a  variety  of  settings;  and
This is a fair description, although a better
description would be that their attention is- There is clear evidence of clinically
"inflexible." People with neurologicalsignificant impairment in social, academic,
difficulties, whether ADD, head injuries,or  occupational  functioning.
autism, fetal alcohol syndrome, forms of
depression, or dementias, have varyingThe reality is that barely anyone can
degrees of neurological inflexibility."squeeze into these parameters." But about 5%
Neurological flexibility is a sign of aof the population can. It is careless to
healthy brain. It is the ability to movesuggest that "anyone... at least on certain
attention from "global" forms of attention todays" can meet the diagnostic criteria. It
"specific" forms of attention at will, in aalso conveys a negative picture of those who
fraction of a second. These various types ofdo  actually  suffer  with  the  condition.
attention are objective and observable (with
PETS, SPECTs, EEGs, QEEGs, and otherWould you publish a statement that read,
technologies). People with ADD have"Almost anyone can squeeze into the
difficulty moving from specific to global, orparameters of Alzheimer's - at least on
global to specific, styles of attention. Itcertain days?" I would certainly hope not,
should be noted that inflexibility ofand yet it is published in connection with
attention is a marker of a neurologicalADHD.  This  is  disappointing.
problem, though by itself is not diagnostic
of  any  specific  problem.This is the end to part one of this
discussion.



1 A B C D 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 94 96 97 98 99 100 101 102