The Controversy About Julia and Julie

I don't think many of the comments I read on the webhave just picked up and cooked from any cook book.
about the Julia/Julie controversy slice through clean.She chose Ms Child, the patron saint of French
They usually swing off-tangent as highly biased praisecooking in America and a virtual member of every
or near-defamatory critique, depending on whether it isAmerican household, as the angel to help her focus
about their favorite or not.and resist her neurosis, by "completing something"
I usually choose to fault circumstances rather thanwithin a schedule. The need for protocol is mentally
persons. And in my opinion, the words "protocol" (asimposed and her heart was unaware of it. She instead
applied to our actions) and "ADD/ADHA" (which Igave in to literary outbursts of familiar fondness and
distinctly heard in the movie), together, cut to theadmiration which to the nervous is an expression of
marrow. When the need for protocol meets up withsupreme good will...sadly, Ms Child felt differently.
ADHA, there is certainly going to be a problem.Underlying this tension between the two, the basic
These are my insights after seeing the movie.goodness in both persons prevented anything more
Ms Julia Child is a public icon, a star in her own right, anharmful than media gossip from making the scene. The
institution. She personified feminine goal-setting andfact that Ms Child didn't pursue deeper into her rights
achievement, points which scored zero stars for Msregarding her publicity in Ms Powell's literary
Powell who was intensely aware of her being aefforts(which she might have done...and then this entire
habitual "half-way-through." The movie suggests thecontroversy: book, movie and all would never have
cause to be ADHA, a neurosis associated withbeen), just goes to show that she had understood the
attention deficiency, hyperactivity and possiblysituation. Might she not have read up on Ms Powell and
emotional fits. Julie's first cubicle scene is not justfallen into a maternal silence when she discovered that
humorous local color. Distracted, fidgety and emotionalbesides not being a cook, Ms Powell was working to
is the picture we get of her, barely listening to clientovercome a handicap? Ms Powell, on the other hand,
after client and finally settling on one whose complaintsnever lost faith in her "angel" and interpreting Ms Child's
meant enough to make her teary-eyed. This showsdisdain as simple disinterestedness, reveals that she is
just this peculiarity of hers. She couldn't focus on thingsa child at heart, neither giving nor taking malice, believing
with her mind unless her heart helped out. But wheneverything to be obtainable or excusable by loving
she did focus, it was with all her heart.fondness.
On the other hand, it would probably have seemed toNeedless to say, the acting is finely nuanced, with such
Ms Child, as it would have to most celebrities, that hera fineness that I didn't realize what I had just seen until
life and fame were being involved by Julie in anlater, after research and reflection. As for the intrigues
unprofessional, inelegant and unflattering setting. Thewhich have grown around this topic, including my own
more so because the Julie/Julia project was really apremature opinions, I found them generally reactive,
log meant to monitor and self-comment on Julie'stangential but stimulating!
personal progress rather than a practical methodologyStrange how we are moved by circumstances. Julie
for bringing out the excellence of the Julia Child recipes.Powell's handicap leads us to focus on a life and
To someone unaware of Julie's real intentions, thecareer which peaked a generation ago. Perhaps life is
project would have seemed like a clumsy caricaturetelling us to slow down and look back a bit. Maybe it's
on the art of cooking. No wonder Ms Child thought thetime for someone to make a movie on Julia Child alone
business "rude"; her initial impression is summed up byand what she has to tell this generation?
"She isn't even a cook!" And all this without her explicitConclusion: The famous blog isn't really about cooking
approval. And we do need the permission of people,at all, strictly speaking it isn't even just about blogging
famous or not, to use them or anything they own foryour experiences either. It is a brave young girl's effort
purposes other than plain citation, and even then, someto overcome her handicap, an effort that has been
people like to know "content and context" before theyrewarded but not fully so. Here's to the eventual
endorse.complete transformation of handicap to talent. Bonne
Given her condition, Ms Powell could not be motivatedChance!!
to accomplishment by strangers and hence couldn't