Health Insurance and the New Stimulus Package

Health insurance coverage for the masses has been inprivate insurance for up to 75% less. The remaining
the news for awhile now. But with the recent6% would not qualify and should be allowed and
campaign season, and the economic downturn the U.S.possibly subsidized until they can find another group
has been experiencing, it has been pushed to thehealth insurance plan or be allowed to remain on
forefront with renewed vigor. While I, like most of you,C.O.B.R.A. until the age of 65 when they would qualify
would like to see the entire population have some typefor Medicare. If the government insist on subsidizing
of health insurance coverage, I don't believe theeveryone on C.O.B.R.A. Wouldn't it be far cheaper for
government should foot the bill. Or at lease not all of it.them just to subsidize the cost of the lower cost
The proposed $836 BILLION dollar stimulus packageprivate plan? Potentially saving billions of dollars while
sets aside about $40,000,000,000.00 (40 billion) to helpstill providing basic coverage for those who lost their
the uninsured. Some of the money is to be used tojobs.
expand medicaid for the poor, while the rest is to usedThe group of people being left out of this plan are the
to subsidize C.O.B.R.A. for those who lose their jobs.people who do not have group coverage, make too
On the surface these seem to be good ideas butmuch money for Medicaid and have to provide their
upon further review the plan is more expensive than itown coverage. I think what these people need is not
needs to be while skipping a large portion of people insubsidies or "free" insurance but information and
the middle.education on what insurance coverages they need
Helping those less fortunate than ourselves is a nobleversus what the think they need. We are at the end
cause, thus I believe helping the poor by expandingof the HMO generation. The time when most had an
Medicaid sounds reasonable, however, the individualHMO plan through our employers or our parents
states we be able to set the baseline for acceptance.employers and there was little to no cast for any
Meaning that if the state sets the limit too some of themedical services. Those days are gone but many
truly needy will not qualify, but if they set the limit toobelieve that is the only acceptable type of coverage,
high then we as tax payers are helping those whoLow cost high coverage and no personal financial
should be able to help themselves. Also covered underresponsability. During these difficult financial times we
the Medicaid program will be those who choose not toneed to take a look at the type of coverage that we
report their income either for tax or immigration issuestruly need, take responsibility for that coverage, seek
as well as those who simply choose not to work. (Butout those that can best advise us and then put it in
that is another article for a different day) If we as theplace.
taxpayers are expected to pay the bills we shouldInsurance is not the governments responsibility it is
have the right to expect our government to enforceOUR responsibility. Government funded insurance
the rules that govern our money. Some portion of theshould not be a right of the people until all of the people
Medicaid funds should be set aside for that purpose.are required to help fund it. These are just my opinions
So that we are not being taken advantage of.and my thoughts and every person is entitled to their
The second portion of the stimulus to to subsidize theown. If you like my ideas or have different ideas of
high cost of C.O.B.R.A. coverage when an employeeyour own, do the right thing and contact your
with company sponsored benefits loses their job. Icongressman and let them know what you would like
believe that this, for the most part, is a tremendousthem to do. Without our voices they are voting on
waste of funds. 94% of people on C.O.B.R.A. wouldthese issues assuming that you agree with their
qualify for an IFP(individual or family plan) thoughopinion.