Examining Drugs for ADHD, Particularly 'Strattera'

In memory of 14 year old Matthew Smith; 11 year oldsubstitute for learning self-discipline. This problem is
Stephanie Hall; and 10 year old Shaina Dunkle andcompounded when children are taken off medication
other children who have died from the use ofand problem behavior initially rebounds to fantastic
psychotropic drugs for "ADHD".proportions. Second, longitudinal studies have confirmed
The Eli Lilly company has been marketing a new drugthat children on drugs actually deteriorate in academic
for those who are labeled as ADHD known asperformance over time. And we must consider the
Strattera. This drug is purported to be a non-stimulantsense of worthlessness most of these young people
medication, however the side effects are similar.experience. (McGuinness, 1985). Paul Wender, M.D. lists
Rather than effecting the dopamine system as do thecriteria when beginning medication, he states that a
stimulants such as methylphenidate andchild must first understand why he is receiving
dextroamphetamine, it works upon the norepinephrinemedication, yet as Greenspan states above, this isn't
neurotransmitter. Strattera is considered aalways happening. Wender states, "Most acknowledge
Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Norepinephrine is theproblems in his own behavior that he himself does not
brain's adrenalin. Norephinephrine is involved in thelike, so that -he will not feel that medicine is being given
increased rate and force of the heart muscle,to him simply so that other people can tolerate him
constriction of heart muscles, pulmonary functionmore." Now, Wender is one who began the first tests
(Hedaya, 1999).on the use of methylphenidate and is in support of its
If these functions are increased, it would be evidentuse in treatment.
that Strattera could produce possible untowardI have had instances of being kicked, and even bitten
effects on the cardiovascular system. It is interestingby children going through behavioral difficulties, but at
to note that in the safety information that Eli Lillythe same time, I found methods to help a child be able
provides on its website, it refers to possible hazards toto deal with behaviors and to have progress while at
those who have heart disease or high blood pressure.the same time encouraging the child's own
Information provided by Eli Lilly accompanyingresponsibility and sovereignty, and working on the
prescriptions of this drug note the possibility ofcreative strengths of the child. Greenspan comments,
tachycardia, and increased blood pressure. Tourette's"working with the strengths of a child can create
disorder, though the etiology is not fully known is beingmotivation." A child needs to be able to recognize and
examined as difficulties arising in the metabolism ofbe motivated to change behaviors and work on
dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. it is knownstrengths. Even Wender states that getting a child to
that stimulant drugs can produce Tourette's like'label' behaviors is effective, that a child must recognize
behavior in some children (Breggin, 1998).what is appropriate and what is not, and that parents
If Strattera affects the norepinephrine system, then itshould not encourage the idea that because the
would seem evident that the possibility of suchmedication was wearing off or so forth that such
Tourette's like behavior could also become manifest inexcuses a level of knowledge and responsibility for
some children using Strattera. Therefore, thoughcertain behaviors. In my experiences, I would argue
Strattera is being marketed in the fashion of being athat a child often has complete knowledge of some of
non-stimulant drug, its ill effects are quite similar to thathis or her behaviors and may develop a manipulative
manifested by the stimulant medications. Eli Lilly'smanner and 'test' the parent and find various triggers
website notes that growth suppression is a commonand weaknesses where he the parent will give in to his
side effect and needs to be monitored in childrenimmediate desire. My concern lies too in that whereas
making use of this drug. Loss of appetitite and weightsome may feel medication to create some responsive
loss is also seen. The most common side effects asin level of focus and so forth, it comes with a cost in
listed by Lilly are upset stomach, decreased appetite,side effects. Some may take the view that the
nausea and vomiting, dizziness, tiredness, and moodpotential for progress outweighs the potential side
swings. These are not unlike that associated with theeffects.
stimulant medications.This is where I disagree, and feel it better to avoid that
Lilly states in its press release in regards to Strattera'swhich would cause any side effects, that
introduction: "It's not known precisely how Stratterapsychotherapy alone can manage the difficulties.
reduces ADHD symptoms. Scientists believe it worksThese are some of the things that bring alarm to me.
by blocking or slowing reabsorption of norepinephrine, aWender states, "Most common side effects of the
brain chemical considered important in regulatingstimulant medications are appetite loss...difficulty in falling
attention, impulsivity and activity levels. This keepsasleep." He suggests the use of a small dose of
more norepinephrine at work in the tiny spacessedative 'major tranquilizer' an hour before bedtime to
between neurons in the brain." If we examine thissolve this in some cases. So, here a see a cycle of
statement carefully, we see it states 'it is not preciselydrugs needing to be used and that's worrisome.
known', therefore once again a drug is beingWender states, "Research is being conducted to
prescribed whose effects are not fully known fordetermine the -exact- effects of stimulant medication
a'disorder' whose psychopathology is not yeton growth." This tells me they are prescribing
delineated. Clinical trials for Strattera have been limitedsomething, which they really do not know yet what the
and any information on long term effects has onlyeffects are on growth. He states as well that stimulant
been studied by Lilly itself. It is interesting to note thatmedication IS addictive in adults, but says, "The results
before Strattera was actually placed on the marketsuggest that there is no increased risk for drug abuse
and had just received FDA approval that the stocksassociated with treatment, although -more research is
for Eli Lilly rose 6% at the announcement (CBSneeded to rule this out conclusively.-" Here again, if it is
Marketwatch, November 27, 2002). Lilly is aware that itaddictive to adults, I ask, why not children too, and he
will profit highly by being able to market a drug as asays that research is yet conclusive. With effects on
non-stimulant (though its ill effects are similar), that isthe cardiovascular system, Barkley states, "studies
not a Schedule II drug thus less subject to scrutiny andhave -not- specifically addressed this important issue."
regulation. Hemant K. Shah, an independent analystSo, they are prescribing something for which they are
qouted in an AP Health News Report (August 15,unsure of the effects on growth as well as the
2002) states that Strattera's market potential is largecardiovascular system.
at a time when Eli Lilly is seeking to offset recentBarkley states as well, "The side effect that should
setbacks. , "Parents who have refused stimulantreceive serious attention from clinicians is the possible
dangers because of their knowledge of the hazardsincrease in motor or vocal tics produced by stimulant
involved will now be coerced to utilize Strattera beingmedication." He continues- "It still seems prudent to
led to believe it is somehow safer because it does notscreen children with ADHD adequately for a personal
fall into the category of a stimulant/ Schedule II drug.or family history of tics or Tourette's Syndrome." I
There is no test for ADHD and neurological testingrecall having a session with a child with the mother first
shows these children to be perfectly normal. Dr. Williamand being informed that he was being treated with
Carey of Children's Hospital in Philadelphia states,Ritalin, I later had subsequent time with the father, and
"common assumptions about ADHD include that it ishe had visible tics, this really alarmed me in reading
clearly distinguishable from normal behavior, constitutesabout the issue of tics and Tourette's and I had to
a neurodevelopmental (brain) disability, is relativelyquestion not to the family but within myself if this was
uninfluenced by the environment (home, school)...all ofreally the best option for the child faced with this risk.
these assumptions...must be challenged because of theBarkley also states, "Isolated cases may arise in which
lack of empirical support and the strength of contraryparents note that a child is no longer 'spontaneous' or
evidence...what is now described in the US as ADHD ischildlike in his or her behavior and appears -controlled-
a set of normal behavioral variations. This discrepancyor -socially aloof-. This is concerning, and it appears
leaves the validity (of ADHD) in doubt." The U.S.that stimulants do have an affect in gaining control and
National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmentconformity. Many of the stated results of the stimulant
Conference on ADHD in 1998 reported, " we have domedication are too subjective, and Barkley states
not have an independent, valid test for ADHD, andclearly that, "an improved ability to master increasingly
there are no data to indicate that ADHD is due to adifficult or higher-level academic material, such as that
brain malfunction...and finally, after years of clinicalassessed in achievement tests, has -not- been
research and experience with ADHD, our knowledgedemonstrated.
about the cause or causes of ADHD remainsHere we have an example that it would not have
speculative." Further, Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn, a foundingbeen as a result of stimulant medication if we see
member of the Royal College of General Practitionersacademic progress. Barkley also says that 'low and
in 1998 stated, "ADHD is fraud intended to justifymoderate doses of methylphenidate do reduce the
starting children on a life of drug addiction." The U.S.frequency of aggression and noncompliance in groups
Surgeon General Report declares, "the exact etiologyof children but have no appreciate effect on either
of ADHD is unknown." Lastly, Dr. Joe Kosterich,direction on prosocial or nonsocial behaviors." So, I will
Federal Chair of the Australian Medical Associationacknowledge that stimulants can help with short-term
states, " "The diagnosis of ADD is entirely subjective....behavioral inhibition, but what about long term? This is
There is no test. It is just down to interpretation.my main concern, with the side effects and without
Maybe a child blurts out in class or doesn't sit still. Theevidence of a long-term result and without knowledge
lines between an ADD sufferer and a healthyof long-term results on growth and cardiovascular
exuberant kid can be very blurred." What we aredevelopment, is this really the best option? Barkley
experiencing are children in conflict. We cannot blamestates, " Few studies employing rigorous methodology
and denigrate the child and not respect his dignity. Wehave evaluated the long term efficacy of stimulant
cannot label and suppress behaviors. If a child ismedication. Those that have examined the issue have
conflict, we must take responsibility to see why thisgenerally found little advantage of medication over no
child is in conflict and to use responsible and carefullymedication when evaluated over extended periods
planned interventions to aid this child in being(Pelham, 1985, Weiss & Hechtman, 1993) Children
successful. Some believe that they see enormouswho had been on drugs but were off at the time of
benefits from children on medication. I will give themfollow-up were not found to differ in any important
this benefit, only if we see suppression of behavior,respect from those who had never received
basically chemical restraint, and the creation ofpharmacotherapy."
zombies as our idea of 'progress' or 'success'. ButAnother concern is the effects in mood, I worked with
once again, we are taking normal children and druggingone child who was already experiencing social
them to suppress their behaviors. In order to achievewithdrawal and was going through the trauma of losing
such a 'result', just what is going on in this child's body?a loved one. After receiving stimulant medication, this
Stanley I. Greenspan, a clinical professor of psychiatryintensified. Wender states, "Instead of becoming high or
at George Washington University states that, " Theexcited, these drugs in general calm down ADHD
growing use of medication on their own is achildren and sometimes they may even become
worrisome trend while more and more people onsomewhat sad." Barkley states, "some children may
Prozac or Ritalin are becoming bolder and lessevidence various mild negative moods or emotions in
distractible, at the same time, more and more peoplereaction to stimulants...Some children describe feeling
are altering their moods without understanding what is'funny', 'different' or dizzy as a function of medication."
happening to them or how it relates to their coreWhat about self-esteem and confidence, Greenspan
personalities."acknowledges that creativity can be affected, and
He also states, "given appropriate nurturing, manyBarkley states, " some concern has been raised that
affected children may not require medication."diminished self-esteem could be a emanative effect of
University of South Florida Professor of Psychology,methylphenidate as children may attribute the source
Diane McGuinness comments, "The first factor ofof their success while on medication to external rather
being put on drugs is to attribute your bad behavior tothan internal factors.
factors beyond your control. Drugs become a