Distributive Justice and Assisted Reproductive Technology

Distributive justice does not imply that everyone shouldare denied access because the procedures are out of
have equal access to everything all the time. Thisreach financially. Infertile couples in the middle and
would be an extreme position and lead to severelower economic classes may be working two jobs
distortions in availability of medical services. Competingand contributing substantially to the welfare of their
needs must be balanced fairly and opportunities tocommunities, but still have no chance to flourish as a
access medical care must be equitable. In thefamily and raise children of their own.
American health care marketplace, however, theThis is economic favoritism of the worst kind. The rich
bioethical principle of distributive justice receives lipget richer, literally. It's a simple calculus. If you're an
service only. In America, when it comes to health care,infertile couple with plenty of discretionary capital, you
minimal attention is paid to matters of fairness.can undergo IVF and have a child. Infertile couples who
For example, assisted reproductive technologiescan't afford the price of admission are out of luck.
(ART) have been generally available since the earlyFertility clinics accept cash, checks, and credit cards.
1980s. In recent years more than 100,000 in vitroTheir front desk people are happy to "discuss financing
fertilization (IVF) procedures are performed annually.options" with potential clients. But if you don't have
But IVF costs - typically ranging between $15,000 andsufficient funds you shouldn't even bother showing up
$25,000 - are rarely covered by insurance plans.for the first appointment. The fertility business is a
Infertile couples wishing to have children need to payprime example of the transformation of American
for IVF out of their own pockets. National statisticsmedical priorities from patient care to financial
indicate that for women younger than age 35, 41% oftransactions.
IVF procedures result in a live birth. For womenDistributive justice doesn't mandate that all infertile
between ages 35 and 37, 31% of IVFs result in a livecouples have equal access. But the principle does
birth. So it's likely that many couples will need torequire that some couples without the financial
undergo at least two rounds of IVF, spending awherewithal be able to undergo IVF. Fertility clinics
minimum of $30,000 and possibly more than $50,000 inshould be required to provide a specific minimum of
attempts to have a family.annual pro bono procedures. Federal funds should be
As the median household income in the United Statesavailable to provide IVF services to additional couples.
was approximately $50,000 in 2008, it's obvious thatAccess to funding could be based on a national lottery.
very few families can afford what reproductiveThere are many solutions. What's needed is the will to
medicine has to offer. This harsh reality implies that theput some flesh on the bones of distributive justice. It's
vast majority of families that could benefit from ARTthe right thing to do.